Legal Opinion

Foster v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 9, 1971No. 287-2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, C.J.

This appeal poses a single question which may be stated as follows: In a tort action for personal injuries to both the husband and the wife, after it has been unequivocally demonstrated that the husband is incompetent and no guardian ad litem has been appointed for him, is it necessary to dismiss the husband’s cause of action upon defendant’s motion therefor? Our answer to this question is in the negative.

This case arose as a result of an auto accident in which both Mr. and Mrs. Foster, plaintiffs-respondents, were injured. Mr. Foster sustained injuries so severe that he was unable to write,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marston v. RueWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hawkins v. Front Street Cable Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Erhardt v. Havens, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Dill v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Flaherty v. FlahertyWashington Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeLozier v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  2. Barrett v. FreiseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Perez v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Davidson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API