Legal Opinion

Wakefield v. Orient Insurance Co. of Hartford

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1880PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Winnebago County. Action on a policy of insurance against fire. Defendant appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This is an action to recover upon a policy of insurance upon a dwelling-house. At the time of the fire the dwelling-house insured was vacant and unoccupied, and had been so for two months. The evidence shows that at the time of the fire the policy was, and had been for a year or more, in the possession of the agents of the company, kept by them for the use and benefit of the owners thereof; and that amongst other conditions in the policy were the following: “ If the premises insured shall at any time during the life of this policy become vacant, by the removal of the owner or occupant,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Ætna Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Clinton v. . the Hope Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Lawe v. HydeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Insurance Cos. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  5. Schunck v. Gegenseitiger Wittwen und Waisen FondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mathews v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Lamberton v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Beyer v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Patterson v. American InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Carey v. German American InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API