Legal Opinion

United States v. Pere Marquette R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York

Decided June 17, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, District Judge.

This action is brought to recover a penalty under Act June 29, 1906, c. 3594, 34 Stat. 607 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 918), entitled “An act to prevent cruelty to animals while in transit,” commonly called the “28-Hour Act.” The act provides, in substance, that no railroad transporting cattle between the states shall confine them in cars — •

“for a period longer than twenty-eight consecutive hours without unloading the same in a humane maimer, into properly equipped pens for rest, water, and feeding, for a period of at least five consecutive hours, unless prevented by…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hogg v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Bradford v. HinesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API