Hughitt v. Sayen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Delta; Collingwood (Charles B.), J., presiding. Assumpsit by Orrin N. Hughitt and others, co-partners as A. J. Hughitt & Sons, against Joseph E. Sayen on certain promissory notes. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
In the summer of 1914 plaintiffs, who were operators and dealers in forest products, had business relations with defendant, who was engaged in getting out and selling ties, in connection with which two notes were given by him to them, one for the sum of $1,200 dated July 2, 1914, due in one year .after date with interest at 7 per cent, and the other for the sum of $1,000 dated September 1, 1914, due ;six months after date with interest at 7 per cent., and the following contract was entered into between the parties:
““Memorandum of agreement, made and entered into this 24th day of July, 1914,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Maxson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Horner v. FellowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1843
- North v. MetzMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by1 opinion
- Garey v. Kelvinator Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937