Legal Opinion

Meloy v. Imperial Land Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1912No. L.A. No. 2911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

A controversy having arisen between the co-partnership of Miller and. Meloy (under whom plaintiff claims as assignee) and the defendant Imperial Land Company, an agreement was entered into for the submission of such controversy to arbitration. This action was instituted to recover the sums of $76-7.50 and $2,667.50, alleged to have been found by the arbitrators to be due from the defendant. A second count, based on the same cause of action embodied in the arbitration, was dismissed upon motion of the plaintiff.

The agreement for arbitration did not comply with the terms of section 1283 of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between Kreiss & HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christenson v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API