Legal Opinion

Brooks v. City of Maysville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 24, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Mason Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

¡Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

¡Affirming.

This is the second appeal of this case. On the first ¡appeal the present appellee, City of Maysville, was the appellant.

The opinion then handed down is reported in 145, Ky., 526, and as it fully sets out and disposes of all the questions, save one of fact, presented by the present appeal, a like elaborate statement of them will not now be attempted. It is sufficient to say that the action is one brought by the appellant to recover of the appellee city, damages for the inundation of her lot and buildings, *708caused by the overflowing of a ravine or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Downend v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CopasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
  3. Drake's Adm'r v. SemoninCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio R. v. ThiemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  5. City of Louisville v. Snow's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Donoho v. RawleighCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Anderson v. City of LudlowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Board of Trustees of Town of Auburn v. ChyleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Ison v. IsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  5. Johnson v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API