Legal Opinion

Emery v. MacKiewicz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1968No. Appeal, 357PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Plaintiff (appellee) brought a trespass action for personal injuries arising out of an automobile collision on South River Street in Wilkes-Barre on June 6, 1960. Plaintiff claimed that his automobile while stopped on River Street was hit from the rear by defendant Lamp-man’s vehicle, which was being driven by his agent, Mackiewicz. After plaintiff had been examined, not by one but by two of his physicians, and had been advised by them of the injuries he sustained and of the prognosis, he agreed to settle for $350, and in consideration of the payment of this…

2Cited by36 opinions

  1. Buttermore v. Aliquippa HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Northern Security Insurance Co. v. Mitec Electronics, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. LaFleur v. C.C. Pierce Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Holmes v. Lankenau HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Portlight, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API