Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Hull

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the first district and from an order overruling a motion for a new trial. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

ZaNE, C. J.:

The plaintiff obtained a decree in the district court perpetually enjoining the defendants from obstructing or-closing an alleged highway on the line between sections 7 and 8, in township o N., of range 2 W., of the Salt Lake meridian, in Weber, county. From that order the-defendants appealed, and they now assign the action of the court in making it as error.

The court found from the evidence the existence of' the road described in the complaint. The appellants contend that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant the finding, while the respondent affirms that the evidence was…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morris v. BluntUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Whittaker v. FergusonUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Schettler v. LynchUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Thurman v. ByramUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Bamberger Electric R. v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API