Caldwell & Co. v. Cherry
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The primary question in cause No. 4216 is whether or not the trustee in bankruptcy can recover from Caldwell & Co. for money unexpended or misapplied, which was derived from the sale of the hotel company’s bonds under the contract between appellant and the hotel company. In deciding this question it is well to remember that, if the trustee in bankruptcy recovers in this action, he must do so on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of his adversary’s title. In comparative terms it is quite easy to determine the title of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- McLean v. FickeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Hubbard v. Robert B. Wallace Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Larson v. Lombard Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Jensen v. Lewis Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Danville Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
- LaRose v. OMalleyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024