Legal Opinion
State v. Hoisington
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1983No. 13104Published
1Opinion of the Court
657 P.2d 17 (1983)
104 Idaho 153
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Monte Craig HOISINGTON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13104.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
January 7, 1983.
Darrel W. Aherin, of Aherin & Rice, Lewiston, for defendant-appellant.
David H. Leroy, Atty. Gen., Lynn E. Thomas, Sol. Gen., Gordon Petrie, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Howard Carsman, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.
BAKES, Justice.
I
FACTS
Appellant appeals his convictions for two counts of rape and one count of an infamous crime against nature. One count of rape and the count of an infamous crime against nature were…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.