Legal Opinion

In re Judicial Settlement of Account of Robert

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeals by Frederick Robert and Jane R. Corning from a decree of the surrogate of the county of New York, ^ settling the accounts of the executor of the estate of Christopher R. Robert, deceased.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The testator died in October, 1818, having made and executed his last will and testament on the 12th of the preceding month of January. By this will he dis*331posed of all his estate, real and personal. By the fourth paragraph, or subdivision of the will, he directed the residue and remainder of his estate not previously disposed of, to be divided into fifty equal parts, and gave twelve of such parts to his son, Christopher E. Eobert, Jr.; eleven of such parts to his son, Frederick Eobert; twelve of such parts to his son, Howell W. Eobert; five of such parts to his daughter, Jane E. Corning; and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robert v. . CorningNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Phillips v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Langdon v. . Astor's ExecutorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Tonnele v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  5. Lytle v. . BeveridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Inhabitants of Phillips v. Inhabitants of KingfieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API