Legal Opinion

People v. Cummings

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 22, 1977No. 76-20PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

The defendants, Theopolis Wells and Donald Cummings, were charged by indictment with the offense of armed robbery. In April of 1975, they were tried before a jury for that offense, but after eight hours of jury deliberations and after the jury foreman informed the trial judge that the jury was deadlocked and that additional time could not resolve the deadlock, the trial judge, the Honorable Robert Buchar, declared a mistrial. The defendants did not object to the declaration of a mistrial. Following the declaration of mistrial the jury foreman related the results of the jury’s voting:

1st…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. The People v. NilssonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. United States v. Luis CastellanosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. Preston v. BlackledgeDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SierbMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. People v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. People v. SierbMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API