Legal Opinion
McNally v. Walkowski
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1969No. 5771Published
1Opinion of the Court
462 P.2d 1016 (1969)
Curtis A. McNALLY, Appellant,
v.
David J. WALKOWSKI, Respondent.
No. 5771.
Supreme Court of Nevada.
December 18, 1969.
Gordon W. Rice, Reno, for appellant.
Vargas, Bartlett & Dixon and John C. Renshaw, Reno, for respondent.
OPINION
MOWBRAY, Justice.
This appeal challenges the rule announced by Lord Mansfield in Vaise v. Delaval, 1 Term.Rep. 11 (K.B. 1785), that a juror's statement may not be admitted to impeach a verdict in which the juror participated.
McNally was injured in a single-car turnover accident. Walkowski was the driver of the vehicle in which McNally was riding as a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Wright v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Kollert v. CundiffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Lee v. Baltimore Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.