Legal Opinion

Niemi v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1934Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing. After the foregoing opinion was filed the motion of the plaintiffs in the first three actions for a rehearing was granted upon the issue of the effect of contributory fault.

Allen, C. J.

The motions for directed verdicts at the trial, being general, raised the issue of the right to them either by reason of an insufficiency of evidence for the plaintiffs or of conclusive proof of a, good defence. Williams v. Duston, 79 N. H. 490, 491; Dwyer v. Insurance Co., 72 N. H. 572, 576. Neither the course of the trial nor failure to except to the charge affected the standing of the motions.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. DunlapSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  2. Dimock v. LussierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  3. Williams v. DustonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
  4. Dwyer v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
  5. Page v. HodgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API