State v. Aitkin County Farm Land Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
The state appeals from an order denying its blended motion for amended findings and conclusions of law or a new trial.
As the facts are founded upon official records, there is no dispute respecting them. We adopt the findings of the court, absent as here any claim of inaccuracy.
Two actions were brought by the state against defendant to quiet title to two separate parcels of real estate in Aitkin county, one involving a 40-acre tract and the other an entire section. The two actions were consolidated for trial for all purposes and are so submitted here.
Defendant, a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Reed v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Merrill v. DearingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- State ex rel. National Bond & Security Co. v. KrahmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- State ex rel. Wheeler v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- State ex rel. Davenport v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hamborg v. County of HennepinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993