Legal Opinion

O'NEIL v. National Union Fire

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 18, 1998No. Agency H95-113; CA A93588PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Claimant seeks review of the final order of the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services 1 under ORS 656.327, holding that the prescribed medication Prozac is not “appropriate” to the treatment of a low back condition that claimant suffers as the result of an injury that is compensable under the Workers’ Compensation Law. The decisive issue is whether ORS 656.327(2) requires a “full-scale” contested case hearing or whether the more limited procedures that were followed by the Director were sufficient to satisfy the statute. We conclude that the procedures followed were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fairbanks v. Bureau of Labor and IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Colclasure v. Washington County School District No. 48-JOregon Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berry v. Metro Electrical Joint Apprenticeship & Training CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. SAIF Corp. v. LelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API