Salisbury v. Smouse
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
McFarland, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Ronald and Phyllis Smouse and Myron and Roseanna McRoberts, appeal the Pike County Court of Common Pleas judgment in favor of appellee’s property-boundary claims. Appellants contend that the trial court erred (1) when it found that appellee was entitled to have title quieted as shown on appellee’s exhibits 0 and 1 against the real estate of appellants Ronald and Phyllis Smouse, (2) when it found that appellee was entitled to have title quieted as shown on appellee’s exhibits 0 and 1 against the real estate of appellants Myron and Roseanna…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Adoption of GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Kennedy v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Walker v. DoupOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Victor Mortgage Co. v. ArnoffCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952