Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. Smouse

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 2008No. 08CA777Published

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Ronald and Phyllis Smouse and Myron and Roseanna McRoberts, appeal the Pike County Court of Common Pleas judgment in favor of appellee’s property-boundary claims. Appellants contend that the trial court erred (1) when it found that appellee was entitled to have title quieted as shown on appellee’s exhibits 0 and 1 against the real estate of appellants Ronald and Phyllis Smouse, (2) when it found that appellee was entitled to have title quieted as shown on appellee’s exhibits 0 and 1 against the real estate of appellants Myron and Roseanna…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Adoption of GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kennedy v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Walker v. DoupOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Victor Mortgage Co. v. ArnoffCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API