Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 7, 2003No. 2D02-3556PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

*62In this Anders1 appeal, counsel for Anthony Smith contends that remand is required to correct several sentencing errors related to Smith’s guilty plea to three counts of robbery in circuit court case number CRC01-03019CFANO. Of the three points Smith raised in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2),2 we agree with only one: the written sentencing order should be corrected to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. Otherwise, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

At a sentencing hearing before Judge Luce, Smith pleaded guilty to three counts of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re Anders BriefsSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Windisch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. O'NEILL v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miran v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Nickerson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Kiely v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API