Legal Opinion

Wahlenmaier v. American Quasar Petroleum Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1974No. 6388PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WARD, Justice.

The plaintiffs and defendants filed motions for summary judgment and the one filed by the defendants was granted. The plaintiffs are the owners of overriding royalty interests retained in assignments of oil and gas leases covering two 40 acre tracts of land and filed suits under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, Art. 2524-1, Vernon’s Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann., to construe the meaning of identical overriding royalty reservation clauses contained in the assignments. The trial Court held in favor of the defendants that the assignments are not ambiguous and that the size of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Greene v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Neece v. A. A. A. Realty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Don Drum Real Estate Company v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Bauer v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. HyderTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Texas West Oil & Gas Corp. v. El Paso Gas Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. GENERAL STAR INDEMNITY CO. v. Sherry Brooke Revocable TrustDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2001
  5. Tapatio Springs Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API