Legal Opinion

Car-Mar Construction Corp. v. Skinner

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 12, 1991No. Civ. A. 88-1504PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Presently before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. This action was brought by plaintiffs Car-Mar Construction Corporation (“Car-Mar”) and its sole owner, Carol Georgalas Pendle-ton (“Pendleton”) against defendants Samuel Skinner in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Transportation, the United States, and the United States Department of Transportation (“DOT”) pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706(2), et seq. The action was brought after DOT upheld the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holland v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF UNIV. OF D. OF COL.District Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  2. TRANSWORLD PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. Canteen Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  3. Jack Wood Construction Co. v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  4. Harrington Trucking, Inc. v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. Charles E. Burkett and Assoc. v. DotDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API