Legal Opinion

Richard Jackson v. David Speer

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1992No. 92-1419PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:

BACKGROUND

Jackson sued Speer on May 1, 1991 alleging, among other things, that Speer fraudulently induced him into investing in a piece of property in Montana. Speer filed a mo tion for summary judgment alleging Jackson's actions were barred by the applicable four year statute of limitations. In response, Jackson asserted that section 16.-063 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, (the “Tolling Statute”) applies to this case and suspended the running of the statute of limitations while Speer was absent from Texas. The testimony presented at the hearing on motion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Williams v. KhalafTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Quinn v. PressTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Wise v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Richardson v. Washington & Costley Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rubinstein v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Matter of Haber Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. McGill v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. In Re Jack Kline Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  5. Hawkins v. Upjohn Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API