Legal Opinion

Hill v. Mills

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2010No. 2008-CA-01343-SCTPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, Justice,

for the Court.

¶ 1. The primary issue presented by the plaintiff in this medical-negligence case is whether the trial court properly applied Mississippi Rule of Evidence 702 (sometimes referred to as the Daubert1 standard) to exclude the opinions offered by her expert, leading to dismissal of all of her claims. We are also asked to review the trial judge’s denial of the plaintiffs motion to recuse.

BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

¶2. On May 8, 2002, Shanika Hill presented to King’s Daughters Medical Center, complaining of lower abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding. Dr. Richard…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemoreMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Bredemeier v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Poole Ex Rel. Poole v. AvaraMississippi Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Charles Norman, Jr. v. Anderson Regional Medical CenterMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Hyundai Motor America v. ApplewhiteMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Patterson Ex Rel. Estate of Coleman v. TibbsMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport v. Barry G. WhiteMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Eli Investments, LLC v. Silver Slipper Casino Venture, LLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2013

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API