Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railroad v. Schmidt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1897No. 17,351PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From tlie Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, C. J.

This is an action by the appellee to recover damages for the alleged negligence of appellant, which resulted in her sustaining serious personal injuries. There was a special verdict, and upon the facts found the trial court awarded appellee a judgment. On July 5,1890, the time of the accident, appellee, who was about seventeen years of age, accompanied by her brother, who was fifteen years old, and also by another boy of the age of fourteen years, was riding in a light spring wagon, taking flowers to market in the city of Indianapolis. At a point on East street, a public street in said city,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co. v. GoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GainesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Makepeace v. BronnenbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. CheekIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Gunder v. TibbitsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Lyons v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. OhlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Vivian Collieries Co. v. CahallIndiana Supreme Court · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API