Legal Opinion

People v. Haywood

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1952No. Crim. 911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

Defendant was charged Avith, and by a jury found guilty of, the crimes of kidnapping, robbery and forcibly raping one Lola Sickler. He was sentenced to the state’s prison on each of the three counts contained in the information and appeals from the judgment. Defendant admits that the evidence was amply sufficient to support the verdict and the judgment. His contentions on appeal are that the court committed prejudicial error in (1) failing to instruct the jury on the question of alibi; and (2) failing to instruct the jury as to the testimony of accomplices.

The record shows that the defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. People v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. People v. BagleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API