Legal Opinion

People v. Masters

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 1963No. Crim. 3892PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Question Presented

MOLINARI, J.

On this appeal from a judgment of conviction for armed robbery, and from the order denying a motion for new trial, the sole question presented is whether the trial court erred prejudically in failing to instruct the jury on circumstantial evidence.

The Record

The instant appeal is by Richard T. Masters (hereinafter referred to as “Masters” or “appellant”), who was charged jointly with Harry R. Feuersinger (hereinafter referred to as “Feuersinger”) and Peter A. Lucero (hereinafter referred to as “Lucero”) of violating Penal Code section 211 (armed robbery).

On May…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. KetchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. BeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. WileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. ButtsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. GibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. OttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API