Legal Opinion

Clyncke v. Waneka

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 21, 2007No. 06SC66Published

1Opinion of the Court

157 P.3d 1072 (2007)

Freeman CLYNCKE and Danny Clyncke, Petitioners.

v.

Michele WANEKA, Respondent.

No. 06SC66.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

February 26, 2007.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing May 21, 2007.[*]

Lambdin & Chaney, LLP, L. Kathleen Chaney, John W. Fairless, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Petitioners.

Peter William Thomas, PC, Peter W. Thomas, Jr., Snowmass Village, Colorado, Attorneys for Respondent.

Justice BENDER delivered the Judgment and an Opinion.

I. Introduction

In this appeal, we review and affirm the court of appeals' conclusion in Waneka v. Clyncke, 134 P.3d 492…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Vaughan v. McMinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. United States v. FiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  5. Walton v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API