Legal Opinion
Village of Davenport v. Meyer Hydro-Electric Power Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1923No. 22368PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Button, District Judge.
In the year 1915 the village of Davenport, Nebraska, and Ernest Meyer entered into a contract, whereby Meyer-agreed to furnish electric current to the village at rates specified in the contract, and the village agreed to accept such current and pay therefor. To this end ordinance No. 48 was passed, whereby a contract was tendered Meyer for a term of 25 years. This ordinance fixed a minimum and maximum rate, and provided for current for Meyer for milling purposes, and contained many provisions unnecessary to recite herein. This tender was accepted by Meyer, in what is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Vicksburg v. Vicksburg Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Bell v. KirklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- In re Waterloo Organ Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- Rogers v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Baker v. Montana Petroleum Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935