Legal Opinion

United States v. Gentry

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 8, 2005No. 04-11221PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRADO, Circuit Judge:

The question presented in this case is whether United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), applies retroactively on collateral review to a federal prisoner’s initial 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Because we determine that Booker does not apply retroactively on collateral review to an initial 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, we affirm the district court’s denial of Gentry’s § 2255 motion.

I. Background

On December 9, 2003, a jury convicted Kenesha Gentry, federal prisoner # 30395-177, of (1) possession with the intent to distribute 100 or more grams of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. DunphyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Edwin Edwards, United States of America v. Andrew Martin, United States of America v. Stephen EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. In Re: FashinaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  4. Contreras v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  5. Johnson v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API