Legal Opinion

State v. Wells

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 21, 1996No. 950773-CAPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Stephen Wells appeals his conviction of attempted possession of a controlled substance, a class A misdemeanor, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 58-37-8(2)(a)(i) (1994). Wells claims the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Because search and seizure issues are fact sensitive, “we recite the facts in detail.” State v. Naisbitt, 827 P.2d 969, 970 (Utah App.1992).

On December 27, 1993, four Salt Lake County police officers went to appellant’s home to execute drug-related arrest warrants for appellant and his…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  5. United States v. Irving L. NapueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. TopanotesUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. MontoyaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  4. State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  5. Brigham City v. StuartCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API