Legal Opinion

Valley Smokeless Coal Co. v. Hager

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 1928No. Appeal, 43PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Plaintiff appeals from the refusal of the court below to set aside a judgment of nonsuit, in an action wherein, the statement of claim averred, and the testimony tended to prove, that defendant “by his agents or servants, acting under his instructions and with his knowledge and consent,......[took a specified quantity of coal] from the lands of plaintiff, and thereupon sold the same and converted the proceeds to his own use. Said entry, mining, removal, sale and conversion were made by defendant wilfully, intentionally, without the consent of plaintiff, and with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Proprietors v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Fairchild v. Dunbar Furnace Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1889
  3. Hughes v. StevensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  4. Deer v. Sheraden BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Matthews v. RushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. Conestoga Title InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Francis v. Darlington Brick & Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Wayne v. International Shoe Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cambria County1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API