Legal Opinion
United States v. Pueblo de Zia
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 16, 1973No. Appeal No. 1-72; Ind. Cl. Comm. Docket No. 137PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDukeee, Senior Judge
The Government here appeals from a final judgment and order of the Indian Claims Commission disallowing certain claimed gratuities as offsets against the final award in the Commission’s Docket No. 137. Docket No. 137 initially involved a claim by the three Indian pueblos of Zia, Jemez and Santa Ana under 'Section 2, Clause 4 of the Indian Claims Commission Act (60 Stat. 1049, 1050)1 that through various acts the United 'States had taken without compensation some 520,000 acres of land in north central New Mexico belonging to these pueblos.
•In its first ruling on this claim, 11 Ind. Cl. Comm.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Otoe and Missouria Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Red Lake, Pembina & White Earth Bands v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1866
- The United States v. The Delaware Tribe of Indians and the Absentee Delaware Tribe of IndiansUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Pawnee Indian Tribe of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pueblo of Jemez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Red Lake Band v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Pueblo of Jemez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.