Legal Opinion
Little v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided July 17, 2014No. Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-01214-JHMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memokandum Opinion and Order
JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss [DN 29] of Louisville Gas and Electric Company (“LG & E”) and PPL Corporation (“PPL”). Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for decision. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. Background
This case involves the operation of the Cane Run power plant in southwestern Louisville. The Plaintiffs allege that beginning in 2008, they and their neighbors began noticing a persistent film of dust that coated their homes and properties. (See Compl. [DN…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kathy Little v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Alleyne v. Diageo USVI, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Black Warrior River-Keeper, Inc. v. Drummond Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
- Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Envtl. Prot. AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Ky. Waterways Alliance v. Ky. Utilities Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017