Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Haynes

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Tazewell county; the Hon. Charles Turner, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

This suit was brought in replevin, to recover a mule, and was finally tried upon a declaration in'trover.

• Counsel for appellant insist that there was no authority to issue an alias writ of replevin.

The first writ was served after the return day, and when it had ceased to have any vitality. This did not give the court any jurisdiction of the person, and no judgment could properly be rendered upon such service and return. The suit was, however, pending in court, and it was proper to order the issuance of another summons, and continue the cause.

Where the party is not served, a second writ of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dunning v. DunningIllinois Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tegtmeyer v. TegtmeyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  2. Harney-Morgan Chevrolet Olds Co. v. RabinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Van Benschoten v. FalesMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API