Legal Opinion

Catlow v. Cooksey

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 16, 1971No. Miscellaneous Docket No. 71-48PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion of the Court

In his “Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of Habeas Corpus” filed in the above-entitled action, petitioner predicates the relief requested upon the following factual allegations :

On November 20, 1969, a general court-martial convened by order of the respondent, Commanding General, Fort Dix, New Jersey, convicted petitioner of participating in a riot and of aggravated arson.1 A sentence extending to dishonorable discharge and forfeiture of all pay and allowances was adjudged. The convening authority, respondent herein, approved the sentence, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. KelleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. Font v. SeamanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. Dale v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. Jones v. LemondUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Raymond G. Dechamplain v. Col. Hewitt E. Lovelace, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Tuttle v. Commanding OfficerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  3. Bumpus v. ThurnherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973
  4. DeChamplain v. LovelaceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1974
  5. Hiler v. DominaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API