L & T Investment Corp. v. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRAHAN, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff L & T Investment Corporation (“L & T”) appeals the judgment entered following a directed verdict in favor of Defendant Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission (“Commission”) in an inverse condemnation action. We affirm.
In considering the propriety of a directed verdict, we view the evidence and permissible inferences in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, disregarding contrary evidence and inferences and determine whether based on that evidence the plaintiff made a submissible case. Friend v. Holman, 888 S.W.2d 369, 371 (Mo.App.1994).
This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. MeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Gradsky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Christy v. C.B. Q.R.R. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1948
- Filger v. State Highway Commission of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Dulany v. Missouri Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Missouri Real Estate & Insurance Agency v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- City of Gainesville v. Morrison Fertilizer, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- D & H Prescription Drug Co. v. City of ColumbiaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998