Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Maldonado v. Hodel

District Court, D. Utah

Decided February 19, 1988No. Civ. 86-C-1050GPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

J. THOMAS GREENE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, two “mixed-blood” Ute Indians, bring this action against the Secretary of the Interior and Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, seeking declaratory relief arising out of termination of their status as federally-recognized Indians. Plaintiffs also seek declaratory relief regarding certain acts by the Federal defendants relating to the distribution of tribal assets to plaintiffs. The defendants re sponded by moving to dismiss the complaint.

On September 28, 1987, the court heard arguments on the motion.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hackford v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. Murdock v. Ute Indian Tribe of Uintah & Ouray ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Hackford v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Murdock v. Ute Indian Tribe Of Uintah And Ouray ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Ute Distribution Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API