Legal Opinion
Narragansett Improvement Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 19, 1961No. Nos. 5782, 5783PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge.
These are appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island which was entered in favor of the use-plaintiff both on his claim under the Miller Act, 40 U.S. C.A. §§ 270a-270d and on the defendants’ counterclaim.
Defendant-appellant, Narragansett Improvement Company, (hereinafter called Narragansett) was the general contractor engaged by the United States to construct sewerage disposal facilities, among other things, for use in connection with a Nike site in Foster, Rhode Island. Narragansett as principal executed a standard…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Western Cottonoil Company v. J. C. Hodges and Mary WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Baerveldt & Honig Construction Co. v. SzombathySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Beverly Hospital v. EarlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Homelite, a Division of Textron, Inc., a Rhode Island Corporation v. Trywilk Realty Company, Inc., a North Carolina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Bradshaw v. Superior Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States of America, for the Use of Coastal Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Algernon Blair, Incorporated, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- United States ex rel. Arlmont Air Condition Corp. v. Premier Contractors, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1968
- Narragansett Improvement Company v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Anthony Mello, D/B/A Maple Grove Nurseries, Maryland Casualty Company v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Anthony Mello, D/B/A Maple Grove NurseriesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961