Legal Opinion

Narragansett Improvement Company v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Anthony Mello, D/B/A Maple Grove Nurseries, Maryland Casualty Company v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Anthony Mello, D/B/A Maple Grove Nurseries

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 19, 1961No. 5783_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

290 F.2d 577

NARRAGANSETT IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, Defendant, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of Anthony

MELLO, d/b/a Maple Grove Nurseries, Plaintiff, Appellee.

MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of Anthony

MELLO, d/b/a Maple Grove Nurseries, Plaintiff, Appellee.

Nos. 5782, 5783.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

May 19, 1961.

John E. Graham, III, and Donald P. Ryan, Providence, R.I., with whom G. Chandler Beals, Providence, R.I., on brief, for appellants.

Ronald Lagueux, Providence, R.I., with whom…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Western Cottonoil Company v. J. C. Hodges and Mary WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Baerveldt & Honig Construction Co. v. SzombathySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Beverly Hospital v. EarlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Homelite, a Division of Textron, Inc., a Rhode Island Corporation v. Trywilk Realty Company, Inc., a North Carolina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  5. Bradshaw v. Superior Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API