Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Turner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1984No. CA 8339PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKerns, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in a contempt proceeding in the Dayton Municipal Court, but the contempt order is dependent for validity upon an order overruling a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum issued to the Internal Affairs Division of the Dayton Police Department. In support of its motion to quash, the city of Dayton contended that the internal affairs files of a police department are privileged from any disclosure, and this contention immediately brought into focus the delicate balance between governmental privilege and criminal due process.

In a comprehensive written…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henneman v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. HoopOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. BundyOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. City of Columbus v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. BundyOhio Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API