Legal Opinion

Estate of Gresham v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1985No. 83-1165PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

In order to determine “fair market value” under section 57(a)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C.) (the “Code”) for purposes of the “minimum tax,” 1 Treas.Reg. section 1.57-l(f)(3) (1978) directs a taxpayer to apply the principles found in section 83(a)(1) of the Code. A majority of the Tax Court concluded that the application of section 83(a)(1) valuation principles was inconsistent with the plain language of section 57(a)(6) and thus held section 1.57-l(f)(3) invalid insofar as it requires the fair market value of stock acquired pursuant to the exercise…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Lykes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Boeing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jackie L. And Janet G. McDonald v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Balestra v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  3. Gudmundsson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  4. Laverne Smoot, as of the Estate of Ruth M. Smoot v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. ESTATE OFCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API