Legal Opinion

Rush v. Delaware & Chesapeake S. S. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1935No. Nos. 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

Leave was given to file briefs, and subsequently supplemental, and again reply, briefs. These have now been submitted and the cause ripe for a ruling.

The Fact Situation and General Findings.

The questions here raised are in some respects novel and call for a somewhat extended discussion. The genius of the law maritime makes of a vessel a sentient being having the needs of its existence and support and endowed with capacity to pledge itself, its tackle, earned freight, and, on occasion, even its cargo, by way of general average. It may borrow money on bottomry bonds to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Detroit Trust Co. v. the Thomas BarlumSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. In re Empire Shipbuilding Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  3. The UnderwriterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
  4. The Red LionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1927
  5. The Jean L.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Levy-Mellon MarineUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1986
  2. The R. LenahanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API