Legal Opinion

Gulf Refining Co. v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1947No. 30910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The single question of law presented is whether the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals,, so far as it denies the claim of the company for a deduction from book value of the tangible personal property removed by the auditor of Hamilton county from: the real estate tax duplicate in the year 1939, is unreasonable or unlawful. The decision was based upon the ground that Section 5399, General Code, did not apply to the assessment under consideration. The Board of Tax Appeals held against the appellant’s' claim that Section 5 of the Intangible and Personal Property Tax Act of 1931 by implication…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. State Ex Rel. Struble v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Chenoweth v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. State Ex Rel. Hostetter v. HuntOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Seale v. BalsdonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kilbreath v. RudyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bagsarian v. Parker Metal CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
  3. Kacian v. Illes Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Biechele v. City of SanduskyOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State ex rel. Michaels v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API