Ribyat v. Mohawk Valley Barber & Beauty Supply Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment modified, on the law and facts in accordance with the.memorandum and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: In our judgment, the defendants-respondents-appellants have failed to establish an easement by prescription in the driveway involved here. Their use of it has not been adverse or hostile. There is no evidence of actual adverseness, nor any claim of right. Nor under the facts, as disclosed by the evidence, is there any presumption of any adverse claim. (Moore v. Day, 199 App. Div. 76,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Di Leo v. Pecksto Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Pirman v. ConferNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Anthony v. Kennard Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Moore v. DayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Moore v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Peck v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962