Legal Opinion

Jones v. Southern Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 25, 1922No. 3920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs, in the trial court, in three several suits, which had been consolidated for trial, and were thereafter consolidated for review by writ of error, wherein they sought to recover certain quantities of steel rail, with their fastenings, which plaintiffs asserted were their property, and of which the defendant Southern Railway Company was in possession. Said possession was alleged to have been unlawfully taken in the-year 1917. A demand on the Southern Railway Company for said property, and its refusal to comp'ly, were also alleged.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Northern Central Railway Co. v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. HaasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Muncie & Portland Traction Co. v. Citizens Gas & Oil Mining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Texas & N. O. R. v. SchoenfeldTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. American Steel & Iron Co. v. TaftSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  3. Bibb County, Georgia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. SchoenfeldTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Grover v. Sharp & Fellows Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API