Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Stand Up for Democracy v. Secretary of State

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 2012No. Docket 145387Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMarkman, J.

PROLOGUE

Although to many the present dispute over font size may seem to be “much ado about nothing much” and a debate concerning a mere “technicality,” in which there may be only a “dime’s width” of difference between what is required of petitions by the law and what is actually contained in the petitions before the Court, a considerably larger issue is implicated: how faithful must the branch of government that interprets the law be to the language adopted by the branch of government that enacts that law? It is important to bear in mind that the very same constitutional provision that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Manuel v. GillMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Michigan Properties, LLC v. Meridian TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Thompson v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Bloomfield Charter Township v. Oakland County ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API