Legal Opinion

Strouse, Loeb & Co. v. Cohen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Civil action to have certain agreements (one of which is set out in the opinion of Associate Justice Clark) declared a lien upon the separate estate, real and personal, of the feme defendant, in Newbern, N. C. The complaint, after alleging the indebtedness and the agreements (which were signed by the feme defendant, under seal, with the written assent of her husband, and duly probated as to both, with the privy examination of the wife, and duly registered), and further…

Read the full summary

Civil action to have certain agreements (one of which is set out in the opinion of Associate Justice Clark) declared a lien upon the separate estate, real and personal, of the feme defendant, in Newbern, N. C. The complaint, after alleging the indebtedness and the agreements (which were signed by the feme defendant, under seal, with the written assent of her husband, and duly probated as to both, with the privy examination of the wife, and duly registered), and further setting out the character and location of feme defendant’s property, alleged in the fifth paragraph, as follows: “That the…

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

In the present case the married woman executed her note, payable September 1, 1892, recited to be for value received, and further recites in the same instrument: “ The said amount is due the said firm of Strouse, Loeb & Co., by myself, for goods sold and delivered to me by the said firm at the city of Newbern, county of Craven, and State of North Carolina, at which place I am engaged in the business of merchandising; and I being a married woman, and being possessed of a separate estate of both real and personal property, all of which is situated in the said city of Newbern, county…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. . KinslandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Woodlief v. . Harris and ParhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Harris v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Harris v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Comron v. . StandlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snyder v. BridewellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. In Re Foreclosure Under Deed of Trust Made by LongleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Vann v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API