Legal Opinion
Clinton Watch Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 19, 1961No. 13145PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRUBB, District Judge.
Pursuant to Section 5(c) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, Title 15 U.S.C.A. § 45(c), petitioners seek review of a cease and desist order issued by the Federal Trade Commission.
In a complaint issued by the Commission, petitioners, Clinton Watch Company, a corporation, Irving L. Wein, Bernard J. Cogan, and Max Magnus, individually and as officers of said corporation, were charged with preticketing their merchandise at fictitious, excessive prices and with making false and deceptive representations as to the guarantee thereof. The hearing examiner dismissed the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Moog Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Niresk Industries, Inc., a Corporation, and Bernice Stone Kahn, Individually and as an Officer of Said Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baltimore Luggage Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Baltimore Luggage Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Clinton Watch Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961