Legal Opinion
Clinton Watch Company v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 18, 1961No. 13145_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
291 F.2d 838
CLINTON WATCH COMPANY, a corporation, and Irving L. Wein,
Bernard J. Cogan and Max Magnus, individually and
as officers of said corporation, Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 13145.
United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.
June 19, 1961, Rehearing Denied July 18, 1961.
Paul G. Annes, Frank E. & Arthur Gettleman, Franklin M. Lazarus, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners.
Alan B. Hobbes, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James McI. Henderson, Atty., Federal Trade Commission, PGad B. Morehouse, Acting Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
1
Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Moog Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Niresk Industries, Inc., a Corporation, and Bernice Stone Kahn, Individually and as an Officer of Said Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.