Legal Opinion

Mieth v. Ranchquest, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided March 17, 2005No. 01-02-00461-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON FURTHER REHEARING

SAM NUCHIA, Justice.

We grant appellee’s motion for further rehearing, withdraw our opinion issued May 20, 2004, and issue this opinion in its place.

In October 1997, appellants sued appel-lees to recover damages caused to their surface estate by appellees’ operations at and re-entry of an abandoned oil and gas well. The case was tried to a jury in 2001, and the jury found that Texical Energy Corporation d/b/a Texical, Inc. (Texical) was 100% hable for negligence proximately causing injury to appellants’ property. The jury awarded $200,000 as reasonable costs to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Carter v. William Sommerville and Son, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Bayouth v. Lion Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kraft v. LangfordTexas Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Marin Real Estate Partners, L.P. v. VogtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Thomas v. Uzoka, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  3. ExxonMobil Corp. v. Lazy R Ranch, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Marin v. IESI TX CORP., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  5. in Re United Services Automobile Association, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API