Panzer Law, P. A. v. Palm Beach County School District
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In this workers’ compensation matter, we have for review an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denying Appellant, Claimant’s former attorney (Panzer), entitlement to an attorney’s fee based on the failure of the relevant petition for benefits (PFB) to meet the requirements of section 440.192, Florida Statutes (2006). Because the JCC erred by failing to give full effect to all of the provisions of section 440.192, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Because the facts are not in dispute, our review is de novo. See Airey v. Wal-Mart, 24 So.3d 1264, 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lombardi v. Southern Wine & SpiritsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Russell Corp. v. BrooksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Airey v. WAL-MART/SEDGWICKDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Straw v. Steve Moore ChevroletDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- C.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016